DAVID ALEXANDER BATEMAN
  • Home
  • About
  • Books
    • When the People Rule
    • Disenfranchising Democracy
    • Southern Nation
  • Articles and Chapters
    • Articles >
      • A Developmental Approach to Historical Causal Inference
      • A House Divided?
      • An Inherent Tension Within Populist Rhetoric
      • Deeper Roots
      • Democracy-Reinforcing Hardball
      • Democratization in the USA
      • Gilded Age Doughfaces
      • Ideal Points and American Political Development
      • Judicial Power and the Shifting Purpose of Article V
      • Partisan Polarization on Black Suffrage
      • Race, Party, and American Voting Rights
      • Southern Politics Revisited
      • The South in American Political Development
      • Transatlantic Anxieties
    • Chapters >
      • Election Administration and Democratic Fragility
      • Elections, Polarization, and Democratic Resilience
      • Race and Historical Political Economy
  • Working Projects
    • State Legislative Roll Calls
    • Congressional Data
  • Appointments
  • CV

Democratization in the USA? 
​The Impact of Suffrage Qualifications on Politics and Policy

 Journal of Politics 87(1): 50-69
https://doi.org/10.1086/730750

Did the first wave of democratization in America—the removal of property and taxpaying qualifications for white men—change politics and policy? This article leverages unique state-level institutional features to empirically identify the impact of reform on enfranchisement rates, turnout, patterns of representation, and policy outcomes. These are then used as a baseline calibration for national analyses. I draw extensively on a uniquely comprehensive dataset of suffrage qualifications and on newly collected and currently underused data on state electoral results and legislative behavior. I find that there was a sizeable body of adult free men disenfranchised by restrictive property qualifications, the abolition of which had a significant effect on turnout. The impact on patterns of representation and policy outcomes was more modest and often cannot be distinguished from no effect. The most likely explanation is that parties were able to adapt to suffrage reform without changing policy positions.
supplemental-material-march-2024.pdf
File Size: 8570 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
    • When the People Rule
    • Disenfranchising Democracy
    • Southern Nation
  • Articles and Chapters
    • Articles >
      • A Developmental Approach to Historical Causal Inference
      • A House Divided?
      • An Inherent Tension Within Populist Rhetoric
      • Deeper Roots
      • Democracy-Reinforcing Hardball
      • Democratization in the USA
      • Gilded Age Doughfaces
      • Ideal Points and American Political Development
      • Judicial Power and the Shifting Purpose of Article V
      • Partisan Polarization on Black Suffrage
      • Race, Party, and American Voting Rights
      • Southern Politics Revisited
      • The South in American Political Development
      • Transatlantic Anxieties
    • Chapters >
      • Election Administration and Democratic Fragility
      • Elections, Polarization, and Democratic Resilience
      • Race and Historical Political Economy
  • Working Projects
    • State Legislative Roll Calls
    • Congressional Data
  • Appointments
  • CV